Peyelidikan, Penyidikan, Penangkapan Dan Penahanan Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana

Main Article Content

Salman Salman
Dedek Apdillah
Zilvina Putri

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the reasons for arrest in the investigation of a criminal case and the reasons for detention in the investigation of a criminal case. By using normative juridical research methods, it can be concluded: 1. The reason for an arrest in a criminal case investigation is for the purposes of an investigation or investigation carried out by an investigator or investigators at the behest of an investigator against a suspect who is strongly suspected of committing a criminal act based on sufficient initial evidence, namely initial evidence to suspect there is a criminal act. 2. The reasons for detention in the investigation of a criminal case are reasons according to law and reasons according to necessity. The reason according to law is that there must be a strong suspicion based on sufficient evidence that the person has committed a criminal act, and that the criminal threat for that criminal act is five years or more, or a certain criminal offense determined by law, even if the criminal threat is less than five years. year. Legal reasons alone are not enough to detain someone because in addition there must be reasons according to necessity, namely the fear that the suspect or defendant will run away, or damage/disappear evidence or will repeat a criminal act.

Article Details

How to Cite
Salman, Salman, Dedek Apdillah, and Zilvina Putri. “Peyelidikan, Penyidikan, Penangkapan Dan Penahanan Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana”. Adil : Jurnal Hukum STIH YPM 6, no. 1 (May 26, 2024): 1-12. Accessed September 4, 2026. https://adil.stihypm.ac.id/index.php/ojs/article/view/134.
Section
Articles

References

Arqon, M., Rozi, F., Yamani, M., Anggraini, R., & Najwan, J. (2019). The role and effectiveness of the national police commission in enhancing police performance. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 3174-3178.

Bahri, R. A., Hidayah, M. F., & Putri, Z. (2023). Concursus Delictorum dalam Putusan Nomor 25/PID. B/2021/PN. BKO. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2), 70-81.Chandra, F., Harmaini, H., & Candra, D. (2023). Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian dengan Dakwaan Subsidiaritas Di Pengadilan Negeri Bangko. ADIL, 5(2), 1-11.

Dahri, M., Sayuti, S., & Chandra, F. (2023). Penerapan Kitab Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Kitab Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Pemilu. Wajah Hukum, 7(2), 508-519.

Erwin, E., Muhammad, A., Fachrul, R., Muhammad, Y., Sudarna, S., Rita, A., ... & Usman, U. (2020). Assessing The Factors Affecting Traffic Accidents And Its Preventions: A Case Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 9(01), 3964-3971.

Gaol, D. L. (2016). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Prosedur Penangkapan Oleh Penyidik Menurut UU No. 8 Tahun 1981. Lex et Societatis, 4(2.1).

Himpunan Bujuklak, Bujuklap, Bujukmin. Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana. Jakarta, 1990.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Lengkap dengan Penjelasan, Penerbit: Karya Anda, Surabaya.

M. Husein Harun. Penyidik dan penuntut dalam Proses Pidana. PT rineka cipta. Jakarta. 1991.

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan),Sinar Grafika,Jakarta,2005.

Mardiansyah, Y., Harmaini, H., & Sasmita, R. (2024). Lahirnya Mediasi Penal Dilihat dari KUHP Lama dan KUHP Baru. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(1), 23-38.

Marpaung, Leden. Proses Penegakan Perkara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1992.

Juari, Z., Chandra, F., & Kusaimah, K. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Perjudian Toto Gelap Pada Tingkat Peradilan di Pengadilan Negeri Bangko. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2), 105-116.

Ridho, F. A. (2023). Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Membiarkan Perbuatan Cabul di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Muara Bulian. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(1), 22-34.